Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > On Sep 9, 2008, at 7:54 PM, Damian Stewart wrote: > > >> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: >> >>> Yes, the library stuff is a mess. I spent a good deal of time >>> working on import/declare stuff for the 0.40.3-extended release, >>> and for the next release, I plan on spending more time on it. To >>> me, having a library format that is easy to use and install is the >>> top priority right now. >>> What particularly was the problem? Did you try using import or >>> declare? >>> >> i don't know - i haven't kept up with the development of the import/ >> declare/library mechanism, i just use a copy of pd-vanilla with a >> custom .pdrc file pointing to an external directory of stuff. >> >> to make it go we just added mrpeach to the startup lib preferences... >> > > The idea is to embed the library settings into the patch. In > Pd-0.40.3-extended, if you added this to the patch, it would work for > any Pd-0.40.3-extended install: > > [import mrpeach] > > Or could use Miller's declare, but I don't remember what the state of > the declare bugs were in 0.41.4. It would be something like: > > [declare -lib mrpeach] > > or maybe > > [declare -stdpath extra/mrpeach] > > .hc >
Just to be clear, does this mean if I use [import] in a patch, it becomes incompatible with vanilla Pd? Or can [import] be um, imported into vanilla Pd? Phil Stone www.pkstonemusic.com _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
