Hallo, Phil Stone hat gesagt: // Phil Stone wrote: > That's an intriguing idea. I *do* like the pattern matching, but it's > not necessary at the interior level of the synthesizers. I wonder what > the performance differences are, if any, between [routeOSC] and [route]?
I guess, route may even be a bit faster as it just compares symbols and doesn't have to split any strings, but it's probably negligible. > It's tempting, because with your recent work towards a vanilla-ready > filter, it's getting more likely that [svf~] could be replaced with > something non-external, and then my synthesizers could be completely > external-free. I found some diagrams on the web for the svf filter e.g. http://www.earlevel.com/Digitalir%20Audio/StateVar.html so maybe with some tweaking a simple svf could be made with pure Pd, too. (You know, Damian and I and others are on a "Pure Pd" trip ATM, as the Pd in the RJDJ project for smartphones - iPhone only ATM - doesn't load externals. It's also a great exercise.) Ciao -- Frank _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
