Damian Stewart wrote: > IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: > >> now, signal-to-message objects _should_ accept this scheduling, by *not* >> sending messages in the dsp callback, but rather schedule them to the >> next tick (via a "[delay 0]") >> afaik all _internal_ objects adhere to this. > > hm, again.. so, at what point do these invisible '[delay 0]' objects > output their messages? do they end up at the 'head' or the 'tail' (so to > speak) of the 'message avalanche'? or are they somewhere in the middle? >
at the head. always gmadsr IOhannes _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
