Damian Stewart wrote: > Frank Barknecht wrote: > >> Hallo, >> IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: >> >> >>> Damian Stewart wrote: >>> >>>> is there a pure Pd way to remove NaNs? i can't use expr with rjdj.. >>>> >>> i thought expr is part of the RjDj distro... >>> >> Only the BSD parts of Pd are included in RjDj at the moment, so you >> cannot use expr - which is tricky, as in fact there are several math >> functions missing now in RjDj's Pd, for example no [pow~] yet - but >> this will come as a builtin as soon as RjDj jumps to 0.42. >> > > and judging from the lack of replies i assume detecting NaNs is one of > these things as well... > Adding this functionality would be trivial, if you want you can add a ticket on track regarding the issue. In the long run the correct solution would be to try to figure out why there are NaN's ... and fix it there.
Günter _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
