Miller Puckette wrote: > Well, what I want to be able to do is put max-compatible objects into Pd > vanilla (such as gate and scale) without breaking libraries. However, I > didn't realize there were libraries out there that named things the same as > Pd built-ins, with the intention of not ever getting instantiated under > the original name. > > Maybe, if zexy/pack and zexy/unpack are only meant to be called using > their "path" names, it would be better to specify them as "zexy/pack" > etc. in class_new()?
yes, that's what i am doing now (after the bug report). however, this is a hack to avoid the problem rather than a solution to it. fgmasdr IOhannes _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
