IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > Simon Wise wrote: >> On 7 Nov 2008, at 5:53 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >>> actually i have thought if pd could be ported to use double precision? >>> may be optionaly so if your machine is meant to be fast enough then >>> you >>> opt doubles .. >>> is it quite doable? >> what is the new situation with 64-bit compatible pd in 0.41 ?? >> > there is no new situation. > 0.41 has always been 64bit compatible. > but with respect to single vs double precision floats this doesn't change anything. since on 64bit archs, a t_atom is 64bit (+overhead) wide, it might be a good idea to switch to double here, at least in message domain. (but i'm not sure whether signal and message precision should be different (as is in max))
fgamsdr IOhannes _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
