IOhannes m zmoelnig(e)k dio: > altern wrote: >> sorry, it the one that comes with PD 0.39 extended on windows, the pd >> console says >> GEM: ver: 0.91-cvs >> GEM: compiled: Dec 11 2006 > > now even though this is 0.91, it is rather old and i wouldn't trust it. > is there any reason to not use Pd-extended 0.40.3?
i have some awful GEM code which i wrote overnight two years ago. every time i try to update it to latest Gem i dont get very far and breaks my nerves ;) I have a workshop in a couple of weeks and i am not sure it is a good idea to do it now... but i will have to do it at some point. > (nevertheless i cannot remember any changes within the 2 objects you > mentioned; but i would just go and try it) thanks _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
