Martin Schied wrote: > Hey again, > > I'm doing some experiments on artoolkit in different host software. > After not getting pix_artoolkit compiling until know (anybody out there > with a running setup?) I wanted to try a freeframe plugin that handles > tracking. Originally it's written for vvvv: > http://vvvv.org/tiki-index.php?page=FreeFrameARTK%2BTracker. > > In vvvv it's working quite well, but preferring open source software I'd > like to have it working in pd too. Creating pix_freeframe with that > plugin is working (at least it shows some information about the argument > inlets in debug output), but it has only one single outlet (in vvvv it > has additional outlets, which output the tracking data). So my question > here: is that plugin incompatible with pix_freeframe or will it use that > single output for everything? Because of an other Problem I got into > (other Topic), I can't test it by looking at the output yet, there's > only gemlist. > > From what I read about pix_freeframe it only has one outlet - but > perhaps it would be possible to modify pix_freeframe? Or take code from > it for another external (I know, that's easy to say but lots of work, > I'll try it on my own after learning some more c++ stuff)
as far as i understand, the FreeFrame-specs do not deal with analysis-plugins (that is: generating high-level informations from video-frames). vvvv's ARTK-plugin uses an unpublished(?) non-official extension to the FreeFrame-API for retrieving analysis-data. since Gem has (currently) only implemented the FreeFrame-1.0 _standard_, it does not support these things (yet). i will eventually ask on the FF-list, how these things should be dealt with. fgmasdr IOhannes _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
