Andrew Turley wrote: > [dumpOSC] seems to require a port argument, otherwise it will not be > created correctly. Thus, you need: > > [dumpOSC 9393] > > rather than just: > > [dumpOSC] > > Also, if you try to create a second instance of [dumpOSC] with the > same port as an existing instance, the new instance will not be > created. >
this is a canned response: please do not use the old OSCx externals (including [dumpOSC]) as they are known to be broken and only in Pd-extended for legacy reasons. try mrpeach's [udpreceive]+[unpackOSC] instead which is likely to make you a happier human. mfgasdr IOhannes _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
