Yep ! it's good ! ;) I needn't my [unpack] before [pack], it's a mistake ! So here with a [t a b]. ++
Jack
pd-exam-02c.pd
Description: Binary data
Le 26 nov. 08 à 15:28, Matt Barber a écrit :
I think maybe problems of this form need at most three objects, and two if you could do [t 200 300 400 ...]. ------------------------------------------------- [inlet] | ________________ | | | | [200 300 400{ | | | | | [unpack 0 0 0] | | | | | | [pack 0 200 300 400] | | \_________________| | [outlet] ---------------------------------------------------- the outlet of the [pack] is connected to [200 300 400{ message as well as the [outlet], in case the ascii didn't turn out well or was ambiguous. No trigger is necessary in this scenario since the order of operations does not matter in this instance (though it might be better form/style to reset the [pack] in the subpatch before sending the output, and might be necessary if this were meant as an abstraction, where it could be used in recursive loops). However, I think Michal Seta's solution is a lot more scalable -- attached is a patch that shows what I mean. MattDate: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 10:52:09 +0100 From: Frank Barknecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Subject: Re: [PD] Pd exam 02: complete a longer list [was: Pd exam 01]To: [email protected] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hallo, Michal Seta hat gesagt: // Michal Seta wrote:Sorry, missed all the points on the first assignment. Here's my contribution.I think, yours is a pretty cool, original and elegant solution! Ciao --Frank Barknecht Do You RjDj.me? _ ______footils.org__<Frank_test2a.pd>_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing listUNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
