On Dec 5, 2008, at 1:46 PM, Frank Barknecht wrote: > Hallo, > Enrique Erne hat gesagt: // Enrique Erne wrote: > >> Frank Barknecht wrote: >>> Ah, these are even better. Do you mind if I use them in such a >>> way as >>> putting them into the purepd folder of the subversion? ;) >> >> that would be great frank! > > Okay, I added them now to trunk/abstractions/purepd > > I made a little change in that I added second inlets to both gt~ and > lt~ to overwrite the argument. > > Additionally I added [gt2~] and [lt2~] variations at the same place > which compare 2 signals. They don't accept an argument anymore > however.
Are these the fake versions? Within purepd, I don't think that the fake >~ should be named gt~/lt~ is they are not numerically accurate copies of the real >~ <~. The idea of the purepd is that they are exact clones of objects written in Pd. I don't think that library should be a place for "close enough" clones, unless they are clearly named. .hc > > Ciao > -- > Frank Barknecht Do You RjDj.me? _ > ______footils.org__ > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ > listinfo/pd-list ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- All mankind is of one author, and is one volume; when one man dies, one chapter is not torn out of the book, but translated into a better language; and every chapter must be so translated.... -John Donne _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
