Hallo, Matt Barber hat gesagt: // Matt Barber wrote: > If there were a vanilla equivalent of [iter], this would be a lot > better. Attached is a [list-shellsort] and [list-quicksort] which do > the filtering process as part of writing the table -- this cuts down > time -- but unfortunately it removes the instructive use of > [list-filter].
I think, what could be a good solution would be to factor out the table-sorting into separate objects. People who deal with long lists will probably store them in tables instead of lists anyway, and for list sorting, the objects could be a simple as: [inlet] | [pd write-list-to-table] | [table-quicksort $0-table] | [pd dump-table-to-list] | [outlet] Maybe there should be a [table]-abs collection as well? ;) Ciao -- Frank _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
