On Mon, 2 Feb 2009, Miller Puckette wrote:
I'll check this out - I've had a couple of wierd moving crashes before
and it's largely as Mathieu says, switching stuff around and using some
intition.
I don't know whether you use Valgrind, but I would very much recommend it.
It runs your programme in a sort of emulator that checks all memory
accesses. It can help you find a lot more bugs than gdb can. It can tell
you whether it's an uninitialised pointer, dangling pointer, double
free, buffer overflow, etc., and give you both a backtrace of the problem
and a backtrace of the related malloc (!!!).
The main downside is that there can be a lot of false positives, so you
have to learn to recognise those as such and perhaps have to make yourself
a "suppression file" to hide them.
The other main downside is that it can't find most stack-related problems
because that would require the collaboration of the compiler. But most of
the trickiest bugs tend to be malloc-related rather than stack-related.
Of course you can't debug everything with valgrind and this is why I also
use gdb.
I wish gdb were more customisable, so that for example it could print a
t_symbol * like:
gensym("hello")
for example. it could save a lot of time.
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal, Québec_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list