JacK, I know... packOSC works, but udpsend doesn't connect, neither tcpsend...
Jack wrote: > If you use OSC, you need [packOSC] before [udpsend]. See the help > patch of [packOSC] in mrpeach. > ++ > > Jack > > > Le 5 févr. 09 à 16:12, mbutubuntu a écrit : > >> thanks... udpreceive wors wery well.... but udpsend doesn't... :P:P.... >> >> >> >> Jack wrote: >>> Yep, as Roman says try [udpreceive] with [unpackOSC] (OSC comme >>> often 'on' UDP) or [tcpreceive] with [unpackOSC], if you want a >>> service with connection. The choice depends if you absolutely need >>> to receive your data. >>> AFAIK, OSCx accepts only UDP protocol. >>> ++ >>> >>> Jack >>> >>> >>> Le 5 févr. 09 à 14:15, Roman Haefeli a écrit : >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> --- mbutubuntu <[email protected]> schrieb am Do, 5.2.2009: >>>> >>>>> hello folks, I'm using OSC to send information from >>>>> Processing to Pd... >>>>> I started writing my "receiving" Patch in a >>>>> Computer where was Installed >>>>> Ubuntu 8.04 and Pd-extended 0.40.3 in stalled by the .deb >>>>> package, my >>>>> laptop was an Archlinux "client" in which >>>>> Processing was running... >>>>> Processing sent floating point numbers to Pd... All worked >>>>> properly.... >>>>> >>>>> In the second Panorama, my archlinux box is both the >>>>> "server" and the >>>>> "client", Pd is the version 0.41.4 compiled by me >>>>> with all useful >>>>> libraries (OSCx for example)... Pd refuses to receive >>>>> floating point >>>>> numbers from Processing giving me this value: >>>>> >>>>> 1.4013e-45 ...... = n/0 ??? >>>>> >>>>> I can use only Integer numbers.... why ??? >>>> >>>> >>>> hi >>>> >>>> from what i know, OSC supports a whole bunch of number types and >>>> obviously [dumpOSC] doesn't know how to handle the type chosen by >>>> processing. >>>> >>>> i guess, i can't help you here, probably only the author of the >>>> OSCx library can. however, OSCx shouldn't be used anymore, since it >>>> does not seem to be maintained anymore and is known to be buggy. >>>> there is a well maintained and well tested replacement for it in >>>> mrpeach, though it might not be as straight forward to use as OSCx. >>>> >>>> i think, you could replace [dumpOSC] by something like: >>>> >>>> [udpreceive <portnumber>] >>>> | >>>> [unpackOSC] >>>> >>>> good luck >>>> >>>> roman >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> [email protected] mailing list >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >>>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >>> >>> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
