On Sun, 8 Feb 2009, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Do you have any examples of full-fledged languages that don't have an
escaping mechanism?
I used to make rather large programmes using QuickBASIC, which had
doublequote-delimited strings in which you could have spaces, but newlines
had to be made using a CHR$(13) function call and then concatenated using
+.
The equivalent in Pd is more cumbersome because plugging several boxes
together is more cumbersome than writing something grammatical, which is
why [expr] is used so much, for example. It's also more cumbersome because
space is a frequent character but there are very few languages that forbid
it in string literals and/or symbols. LOGO (except ColorLOGO) was like
this, but had also other features to compensate, that Pd doesn't have.
It can also be a speed issue, but with Pd 0.40, a $1$2$3$4$5$6$7$8$9
message box can do it in one pass, just like how the several [sprintf]
externals can do it because they're not limited the way [makefilename] is.
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal, Québec
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
