2009/2/21 B. Bogart <b...@ekran.org>: > Thanks all for your comments. > David, How fast was your python code to generate the tables? Seems like > it would be about the same issues as dynamic patching.
The python code does not generate the tables: it generates a patch. IE: suppose you wrote a patch that load a piece of data into an array: this is your atomic component. Then, with the python script (or any language you like), you generate a patch storing all those atomic components. The goal is just to avoid putting a huge number of components on a patch yourself, since it could be automatized. This is not a dynamic solution: once the patch has been generated, it won't change until you generate it again. So concerning the performances (speed, etc...), they will be the same as non dynamic solution. I don't know if it corresponds to what you're looking for, if it seems to suit your needs, I can try to explain better. -- David Doukhan _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
