Hallo, Mathieu Bouchard hat gesagt: // Mathieu Bouchard wrote: > Well, what do you want to do without [list length]? I say kill all the old > versions of Pd.
Well, I included list length, so it will break on old Pd. I don't follow Pd-extended and I don't remember when [list length] was introduced and when it got fixed to count meta messages as lists neither when settable sends were introduced and I didn't want to look it up so I just played it a tiny bit save - as save ay my educated guesses took me. Not safe. :) > Instead of always looking after Pd 0.39, Why not look after Pd 0.43 ? I > think that the explanation for why [list-drip-quick] is the way it is, > should serve as an example of things that could be changed in Vanilla or > added to Vanilla... as long as you consider Vanilla to be the reference. To me, Vanilla is the reference, but being a bit considerated of others didn't hurt here. > I use font size 10 and they don't overlap and never have. Okay, I took a closer look and here (vanilla, Linux, 0.41) the objects that are next to each other share their right-left borders exactly. So you're right, they don't overlap, but again, as the various GUI changes of Pd-extended and probably those, that Miller is working on, lead to varying box sizes across versions and platforms, I prefer to have a bit more cushion around them in all [list]-abs. > Well, in any case where the highest speed is appreciated and order is not > important, reverse dripping is faster than forward dripping, with today's > pd. Ah, good you remind me of that: I'll add a note to the help files. Ciao -- Frank _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
