Martin Peach wrote:
> Roman Haefeli wrote:
>> i don't know, how much control you have at c level over what is
>> happening at tcp level. in order to solve the current issues at
>> pd-level, information about either the current buffer size or amount of
>> sent bytes  (number of bytes removed from the buffer) would be required.
>> i don't know how and if this is possible at all.
> 
> I don't think it's possible (but then I'm often wrong ;(). There might 
> be an ioctl that will return the buffer size so you could know how much 
> is safe to send at once.

Yes you see I was wrong. There is a getsockopt call that will return the 
buffer size. And a setsockopt that can also set the size on a per-socket 
basis.
On WinXp I get 8192 for the default send buffer.

Martin

_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to