On Feb 27, 2009, at 5:49 PM, danomatika wrote:
On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 19:51 -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Feb 24, 2009, at 1:05 AM, danomatika wrote:
On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 00:03 -0600, John Harrison wrote:
danomatika wrote:
>
> I made a 64bit build of pd-extended using the pd core (0.41 I
believe)
> from the pd-extended svn and it has this table bug. It seems
to only
> access half of the table, at least in the C08 and C09 audio
example
> patches. They work fine in my build using pd-vanilla 0.42.4.
Wow I am surprised to hear that. I remember seeing this table bug
in
0.40 but thought it disappeared on my 64 bit ubuntu Hardy build
of 0.41.
>From reading some of the commit lines, it seems not all changes
in 0.41 have been merged into pd-extended yet.
There is now pd-0.41.4 extended, you need to work from that branch,
or get the code from rsync via the auto-build server.
http://pure-data.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/pure-data/branches/pd-extended/0.41/
Right now, only 'pd' is in the branch, the nightly builds use
everything else from trunk.
I just built that version ... but still bad tables. This is not so
fun as the version I made with 0.42 as the core cannot seem to find
expr and expr~ ...
If that version had table issues, then please submit a bug report and
example patch to the bug tracker. 0.41.4 should work fine on 64-bit.
I am cc'ing the list since you'll have better luck there. I don't
have a 64-bit machine, and I don't use jack a lot.
.hc
---
Dan Wilcox
danomatika.com
robotcowboy.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Looking at things from a more basic level, you can come up with a more
direct solution... It may sound small in theory, but it in practice,
it can change entire economies. - Amy Smith
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
