hi list,

i am trying out if the pd~ object is an alternative for sync playback of audio and video to the “traditional” method of using two instances of pd talking to each other by netserver/netclient.

so the situation is that we need one pd instance with audio on and one without for gem. because audio needs to run without dropouts in the first process, while gem will run in the second process.

to run the video in the parent process and the audio in the subprocess with pd~ doesn't work, because the main process needs audio on. (see pd~ helppatch the last lines)

to run the audio in the parent process and the video in the subprocess using pd~ -noutsig 0 -ninsig 0 doesn't work because pd freezes when using these parameters on pd~

when using pd~-noutsig 0 it does work, but only if the subprocess will switch its dsp computing on for a moment it can be switched of afterwards.

is it a good idea at all to use pd~ for that purpose or should i stick to the netserver/netclient solution?

m. 

Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: Signierter Teil der Nachricht

_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to