oh... and PD does not quit. even if i hit "relaunch" or "ignore" or even if i just try to quit in general....
i have to "force quit" and this has been like this for a little while on differnt systems.. at least at the leopard level. not sure about tiger/ppc/intel - not sure if that all made a difference.... --- On Sun, 3/8/09, mark edward grimm <[email protected]> wrote: > From: mark edward grimm <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [PD] shell .... again.... > To: [email protected] > Cc: "pd_list" <[email protected]> > Date: Sunday, March 8, 2009, 4:07 PM > > what are the symptoms of the crashes? does pd just quit > > with a segfault, > > or does [shell] makes pd hang? > > yeah its really weird.... > > i get: > > "the application pd quit unexpectedly" > > then i can ignore or relaunch... > > either choice PD still runs in the background. the > "ignore" or "relaunch" seems to be only > a nag screen that does not do anything... but at the same > time creates the situation that make PD unusable... > > anyone else with he same? > > maybe its leopard thing? > > > > --- On Sun, 3/8/09, Roman Haefeli > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > From: Roman Haefeli <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [PD] shell .... again.... > > To: [email protected] > > Cc: "pd_list" <[email protected]> > > Date: Sunday, March 8, 2009, 3:02 PM > > On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 11:53 -0700, mark edward grimm > wrote: > > > i have been "trying" to use shell... > works > > OK in linux but in osx it just crashes. > > > > > > i am just wondering if this thread went anywhere: > > > > > > > > > http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2009-01/067700.html > > > > > > i have it in a bunch of patches now and would > love to > > use it more ... if it had more cross-compatibility > (osx) > > because i tend to work with others + other os's. > > > > > > maybe i should just change to pdlua as frank > > suggested? or might shell someday get fixed? > > > > > > not sure what to do.... > > > > what are the symptoms of the crashes? does pd just > quit > > with a segfault, > > or does [shell] makes pd hang? > > > > it's been a while, since i used [shell] the last > time, > > but i remember, > > that i could always make it work with what i wanted, > it was > > just a > > matter of writing the script in a way, so that it > > immediately exits or > > detaches the running processes to the background. > commands, > > that do not > > exit, will make [shell] block pd. all this only > applies, if > > you > > experience hangs, but not segfaults, of course. > > > > roman > > > > > > > > > > > ___________________________________________________________ > > > > Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie > zum > > neuen Yahoo! Mail: http://mail.yahoo.de > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
