the webpage is down, we are trying to get it up ASAP, a damn back up was
schedulled for today...

Anyway,

you guys can still get the forms at

http://porres.googlepages.com/Art.zip
http://porres.googlepages.com/Workshop.zip
http://porres.googlepages.com/Paper.zip

then go to

http://pdcon09.devolts.org/openconf.php

click at Make a Submission, fill the form, get an ID

then go to Upload File to send us the PDFs

Sorry for the trouble.




other extra files can be sent to pdco...@estudiolivre.orgon Sun, Mar 15,
2009 at 3:55 PM, <pd-list-requ...@iem.at> wrote:

> Send Pd-list mailing list submissions to
>        pd-list@iem.at
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>        http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>        pd-list-requ...@iem.at
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>        pd-list-ow...@iem.at
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Pd-list digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: Unified Library was Re: Call for GSoC mentors! March 9th
>      deadline! (hard off)
>   2. Re: change samplerate locally (hard off)
>   3. Re: steep filter? (hard off)
>   4. Re: steep filter? (Jo?o Pais)
>   5. Re: steep filter? (hard off)
>   6. Re: change samplerate locally (hard off)
>   7. Re: change samplerate locally (Martin Peach)
>   8. Re: The PdCon09 webpage is down ... am I too late?
>      (IOhannes m zm?lnig)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 02:00:26 +0900
> From: hard off <hard....@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [PD] Unified Library was Re: Call for GSoC mentors! March
>        9th     deadline!
> To: Hans-Christoph Steiner <h...@eds.org>
> Cc: danomatika <danomat...@gmail.com>, "pd-list@iem.at"
>        <pd-list@iem.at>,       Kyle Klipowicz <kylek...@gmail.com>
> Message-ID:
>        <161320dd0903151000n626f6134h19ea91c5757a7...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> >>But I think that we don't really know well enough how to do the whole
> thing right<<
>
>
> i have good experience in doing a library wrong. :)  i can at least point
> out the flaws in that so they don't get repeated.
>
> none of the libraries are very good general all-purpose toolkits though, in
> my opinion.  i guess that's mainly because none of them have really been
> designed as general toolkits.  there is heaps of good stuff in rjdj, but
> it's all for the phone, which has no pd GUI component.  netpd on the other
> hand, everything has a gui, and it's all designed to work well as a part of
> the netpd system.  but it's a little bit tricky to then use the netpd
> patches outside of netpd.  not really spent too much time with pdmtl, but
> that just seems like more of a collection of patches than an actual
> library.
> s-abstractions and the diy library i did both fall down a bit for me
> because
> they tie the functionality of the patches in too much with the gui and
> state
> saving.
>
> i think what hans is talking about and what we are discussing might be
> completely different things though.  i think hans is talking about a truly
> unified library to join together all the different pieces in pd-extended
> and
> put them all together in a logical and user-friendly manner.  which would
> be
> a pretty massive project, i admit.
>
> i think though, what we're talking about here is more just like a
> collection
> of tools to build synths, sequencers, effects, samplers, recorders,
> soundfile players, etc etc etc.  most of the libraries already mentioned
> are
> doing that.  but the problem is that there are no unified conventions for
> patching, naming, licencing, etc.  and it would be nice to have all the
> best
> and most useful bits of each library in one place, all working together,
> and
> all very simply and easily ported into other pd projects.
>
> i think it's well within our reach to do that at the moment.
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20090316/7b3afd16/attachment-0001.htm
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 02:33:50 +0900
> From: hard off <hard....@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [PD] change samplerate locally
> To: Martin Peach <martin.pe...@sympatico.ca>
> Cc: Pd List <pd-list@iem.at>
> Message-ID:
>        <161320dd0903151033j7d543672yfb3521e6b466...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> hi martin, thanks for taking the time to reply.
>
> i can set pd to whatever samplerate i want in media->audio settings.  i
> just
> checked again going through a whole bunch of values between 22050 and 44100
> and they all work.
>
> my problem is that the samplerate is global, and i need it only to be
> local.  i think the 'solution' i suggested in my 2nd post is going to be
> the
> way to do it, but i just don't know how to do that.
>
>
> [*~ 2048]
> > |
> > [expr~ $v1%2048]
> > |
> > [/~ 2048]
> >
>
> thanks.  that's what i had done originally, but i couldn't hear any effect.
> i guess if i really want 12-bit sound in pd, i'd have to use that construct
> after each and every calculation in the signal chain. seems a fair bit of
> overkill just to make the sound WORSE though!
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20090316/af8b9f6f/attachment-0001.htm
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 02:37:58 +0900
> From: hard off <hard....@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [PD] steep filter?
> To: Jo?o Pais <jmmmp...@googlemail.com>
> Cc: PD-List <pd-list@iem.at>
> Message-ID:
>        <161320dd0903151037u6caa3f54p3ac85c7f5546d...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> it's not possible to filter without ANY roll-off as far as i know.
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20090316/7c76d73b/attachment-0001.htm
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 17:57:52 -0000
> From: Jo?o Pais <jmmmp...@googlemail.com>
> Subject: Re: [PD] steep filter?
> To: "hard off" <hard....@gmail.com>
> Cc: PD-List <pd-list@iem.at>
> Message-ID: <op.uquhiqcxvpc...@jmmmp-thinkpad>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes;
>        charset=iso-8859-15
>
> and close to that? just like the spectral trim in audition or something
> similar.
>
> > it's not possible to filter without ANY roll-off as far as i know.
>
>
>
> --
> Friedenstr. 58
> 10249 Berlin (Deutschland)
> Tel +49 30 42020091 | Mob +49 162 6843570
> jmmmp...@googlemail.com | skype: jmmmpjmmmp
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 03:02:49 +0900
> From: hard off <hard....@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [PD] steep filter?
> To: Jo?o Pais <jmmmp...@googlemail.com>
> Cc: PD-List <pd-list@iem.at>
> Message-ID:
>        <161320dd0903151102s1346f4d2kdfb0f94593ea8...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> chebychev filters look good, elliptic ones look better:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Electronic_linear_filters.svg
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20090316/fd11e740/attachment-0001.htm
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 03:26:44 +0900
> From: hard off <hard....@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [PD] change samplerate locally
> To: Martin Peach <martin.pe...@sympatico.ca>
> Cc: Pd List <pd-list@iem.at>
> Message-ID:
>        <161320dd0903151126y2432df25s537be23a04256...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> actually, i just checked and that method i suggested before doesn't work at
> all.  it's the same as the [phasor~ 28000] - [samphold~] effect.
>
>
>
> martin, i missed this part of your mail before:
>
> >>Unless you're looking for aliasing artifacts, wouldn't it be easier to
> use
> a multi-pole low-pass filter at around 14kHz?<<
>
> i just tried that, and i guess what i need must be the aliasing artifacts.
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20090316/f4e6b417/attachment-0001.htm
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 14:31:51 -0400
> From: Martin Peach <martin.pe...@sympatico.ca>
> Subject: Re: [PD] change samplerate locally
> To: hard off <hard....@gmail.com>
> Cc: Pd List <pd-list@iem.at>
> Message-ID: <blu0-smtp3610f942f55ae14a9282e9ed...@phx.gbl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> hard off wrote:
> > hi martin, thanks for taking the time to reply.
> >
> > i can set pd to whatever samplerate i want in media->audio settings.  i
> > just checked again going through a whole bunch of values between 22050
> > and 44100 and they all work.
>
> Yes you're right. I should have checked first ;)
> Maybe writing into a table at 44100 and using [tabread4~] with a signal
> that is quantized to the ratio of sample rates would work?
>
> >
> > my problem is that the samplerate is global, and i need it only to be
> > local.  i think the 'solution' i suggested in my 2nd post is going to be
> > the way to do it, but i just don't know how to do that.
> >
> >
> >     [*~ 2048]
> >     |
> >     [expr~ $v1%2048]
> >     |
> >     [/~ 2048]
> >
> >
> > thanks.  that's what i had done originally, but i couldn't hear any
> > effect.  i guess if i really want 12-bit sound in pd, i'd have to use
> > that construct after each and every calculation in the signal chain.
> > seems a fair bit of overkill just to make the sound WORSE though!
> >
> >
>
> Well 12-bit sound is pretty good, as good as audio cassette with no
> dolby. You should try replacing 2048 with 128 or less to hear true lo-fi.
>
> Martin
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 19:58:12 +0100
> From: IOhannes m zm?lnig <zmoel...@iem.at>
> Subject: Re: [PD] The PdCon09 webpage is down ... am I too late?
> To: danomatika <danomat...@gmail.com>
> Cc: "pd-list@iem.at" <pd-list@iem.at>
> Message-ID: <49bd4fc4.9070...@iem.at>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> danomatika wrote:
> > Does the PdCon 09 page work for anyone?
> >
> > Naturally, I forgot to apply and realized it is due today and now the
> > page is down ... :(
>
> try these instead:
>
> paper submit page:
> http://pdcon09.devolts.org/author/submit.php
>
> paper upload page (once you have submitted it):
> http://pdcon09.devolts.org/author/upload.php
>
>
> cheers
>
> fgmadsr
> IOhannes
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list mailing list
> Pd-list@iem.at
> to manage your subscription (including un-subscription) see
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
> End of Pd-list Digest, Vol 48, Issue 67
> ***************************************
>



-- 
Alexandre Torres Porres
cel. (11)8179-6226
Website: http://porres.googlepages.com/home
http://www.myspace.com/alexandretorresporres
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to