Hallo, hard off hat gesagt: // hard off wrote: > yeah sorry frank, i should have explained more clearly. > > i also think that no GUI is the way to go for functional abstractions. that > was the big flaw of the DIY library i did, that the function of the > abstractions was tied in with the gui component. i did it that way because > i didn't want to clutter the namespace with too many abstractions, and the > thought of one abstraction for function, and then a different one for GUI > was not appealing at the time. > > but now, i think that is the only way to go. like, as you said, for > polyphony. and then also for the many many cases in which you'd want to > build your own gui for custom control.
Yeah, basically that was all I wanted to say as well. ;) > i do think you guys have got a really really strong system there with > rjlib. but i was just saying that without the gui stuff, it doesn't exactly > fit into being that 'all purpose building blocks' library that we are > discussing. Yes, that's true. rjlib has its focus on audio and control abstractions to be used on mobile devices with vanilla Pd. Some of this fits into a "all purpose" library, but a lot of it doesn't. Ciao -- Frank _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
