I'm not sure if it's a bug but:
when using variance (from mapping library) - I get negative numbers. Since
variance is supposed to be always positive and I don't see anything wrong in the way
the abstraction is done, I presume there is something I'm missing.
My impression is that small changes in the input translate to negative
'variance'
___________________________________________________
Oded Ben-Tal
http://ccrma.stanford.edu/~oded
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
