Well, hindsight is 20/20, but I do have some ideas about improving upon the application itself (esp. regarding past successes/failures at GSoC). I'll be happy to contribute time for editing/touch-ups/clarifications for the next go-around.
-Jonathan --- On Thu, 3/19/09, danomatika <[email protected]> wrote: > From: danomatika <[email protected]> > Subject: [PD] GSoC Fwd: Thank you for your application > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Date: Thursday, March 19, 2009, 10:07 PM > Well, we didn't get accepted but now at least we do have > a > nice > collection of projects for people to take on. > > > http://socghop.appspot.com/program/accepted_orgs/google/gsoc2009 > > .hc > > > BZFlag? > > I guess PD is not a Google MicroSoft fighter ... although > it's kind of > annoying to see rather large, funded projects > getting preference over deserving projects such as PD. > Mabey they'll > site a lack of developer cohesion as PD > is something different for everyone involved. > > Bastards. > > --- > Dan Wilcox > danomatika.com > robotcowboy.com > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
