Oh, Gem, of course. So when I'm not using Gem, I can safely do without
those eight path elements, then?
Also, while I'm being a whinging pest...it's impossible to add a path
element that lives inside the pd-extended.app "folder" using the path
dialog. This is because OS X makes the .app package not look like a
folder, I suppose, but it's unfortunate nevertheless. Off to edit the
.plist, I go.
Thanks, Hans.
Phil
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Well, it makes it easier to find fonts. That's the reason. I suppose
most people aren't using fonts much with Pd. If [declare -path] works
for Gem fonts, then I would consider removing some from the default
prefs.
.hc
On Mar 26, 2009, at 9:23 PM, Phil Stone wrote:
Do there really need to be eight different font-related entries in
the path list for Pd-extended on OS X? If so, why?
Phil
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Computer science is no more related to the computer than astronomy is
related to the telescope. -Edsger Dykstra
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
