Max wrote:
here is the same thing with pix_multiimage instead.
it will crash pd a little bit later than the version with pix_image.


i guess it is crashing right after you try loading 1000000 images (or so) into RAM.
what do you expect?
(if you look carefully, you might also notice that [pix_write] gradually fills up your harddisk. this is no bug either ;-))

or am i missing something obvious (it seems so, as i cannot reproduce the memleak you report with [pix_image] either).

fmgas.dr.
IOhannes

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to