Hmm, just like I think before..how about the PdA? What's the minum memory to run this? I've seen it implemented in iPod.
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:25 PM, Martin Peach <[email protected]>wrote: > Adityo Pratomo wrote: > >> Hi there everybody >> >> I just founded out that I have a BASIC Stamp board lying in my house, and >> I start to think about starting a project that involve this board. But the >> problem is can Pd actually be embedded in a BASIC Stamp? Or if not, can it >> be embedded in an ARduino board? I've noticed that there's PdA (Pure Data >> Anywhere). Can this be used for my project? >> >> > Both the Stamp and the Arduino have insufficient program memory to run Pd, > even with no gui. They are best suited for I/O with a serial connection to > Pd via [comport]. > Also the Stamp can't wait for serial input while doing some other task, so > it works better as an input device. > The Stamp is much slower than the Arduino since it must interpret Basic > tokens at runtime while the Arduino directly executes the machine code > resulting from compiling a higher level language. > > So if your project involves something like reading sensors or activating > motors or lights, they are both good for that, whether or not you have some > higher level of control or display implemented on a desktop/laptop. > > Martin > -- mataharipertama.wordpress.com kotakmakan.multiply.com
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
