I haven't tried this (and can't on this computer), but it occurred to me you may want to see what happens if you put the [pipe 0] directly after the [loadbang] (before the trigger). [pipe] and [delay] should always make a break in logic flow, right?
Matt On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 2:40 AM, Jonathan Wilkes <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks, Matt. > > I also see that I overlooked a previous thread about this very > issue. I guess I shouldn't make a bug tracker entry since it's not > clear whether this is desired behavior or not, but I'm curious: > does anyone desire this behavior? It just seems obscure that > loadbang would bang but disable (non-[pipe]ed) outlets. > > -Jonathan > > > --- On Fri, 4/10/09, Matt Barber <[email protected]> wrote: > >> From: Matt Barber <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [PD] Creation Argument Weirdness >> To: [email protected], "Jonathan Wilkes" <[email protected]> >> Date: Friday, April 10, 2009, 4:34 AM >> > >> > Hi, >> > I think I may have found a bug. After changing the >> abstraction >> > argument, nothing comes out of the outlet to the >> parent patch. I'm on >> > windows; can someone confirm before I post it on the >> bug tracker? >> >> >> Same over here. As a very limited hack, you can throw a >> [pipe 0] in, >> but dataflow ordering gets screwed up. See attached. >> >> M > > > > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
