On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 03:52:33PM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote: > Hallo, > lsw hat gesagt: // lsw wrote: > > > Looks pretty useful. Also a great structures example. > > Btw.: To fill the symbolarray [list-enumerate] from [list]-abs is great. > > [symbolarray] also is pretty fast if you have to lookup something in large > lists. I tested it with an arraysize of 100,000,000 elements, which takes > roughly 300 MB RAM according to my system monitor (with all elements except > the > last one empty). Creating the array takes several seconds, but looking up the > final element happens instantly afterwards. > > The other Pd-vanilla ways I know to implement this are textfile-dumps with > "rewind"+[until] or [select]-constructs or [list-idx], which all are unusable > with arrays of these sizes. > > And of course the patch can be modified to look up any kind of list whose > structure is known. > > Now we still need maps/hashes.
Maybe this is something close: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2008-03/060712.html> Best, Chris. ------------------- http://mccormick.cx _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
