here is the patch ++ s.
2009/4/30 IOhannes m zmoelnig <[email protected]> > stefan wrote: > >> I don't succeed to use the hottest gem... >> >> anyway I will explain some others things I observe about that bug... >> (using os X 10.5 + pd-0.41.4-extended-20090429) >> >> with pix_film and .mov files there is no problem >> (but there is a problem with still images when pix_film is used as >> pix_image) >> > > that is quite interesting, as i think that Gem is agnostic whether > [pix_film] opens an image or a film: it just passes the request to QuickTime > (which might then return a 1-frame "film") > > >> with pix_buffer, when the buffer is looped there is no problem >> >>> when I resize the buffer using [resize $1( >>> >> the used memory increase >> >>> if I resize to a buffer with less frames the used-memory >>> decrease...but... >>> >> each times I resize pix_buffer there is a little bit less ram disponible.. >> > > that's something else and more interesting (in terms of fixability) for me. > could you please post an example patch that exposes this behaviour? > > f > dasrm > IOhannes >
pix_buffer.pd
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
