On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 04:30:24PM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote: > Hallo, > Chris McCormick hat gesagt: // Chris McCormick wrote: > > > On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 03:34:51PM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote: > > > Hallo, > > > danomatika hat gesagt: // danomatika wrote: > > > > > > > My point is, I wish pd didn't force me to work it's way but allow me to > > > > work my way. That's the beauty of patching as opposed to vsts, etc. > > > > You have to build form the ground up. > > > > > > Well, Pd is a programming language, and as with all language, you can say > > > things you'd have wished you didn't say or with programming: It easy to > > > overload > > > any machine (bang until) with a programming language. > > > > I have to say that with most programming languages an infinite loop does not > > mean an X crash. Probably I should contribute code, not words (sorry). > > I never had X crash with bang-until, so that's new to me. However a loop in an > audio language can be worse than in a "normal" programm, as software like Pd > often is run with higher priorities to get better latency performance. Of > course > then an endless loop is a bit trickier to get out of. :(
Wow, I am so wrong. Please forgive me for this FUD! Chris. ------------------- http://mccormick.cx _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
