btw is there a way for the patch to know if it's in -nogui mode?
Am 31.05.2009 um 09:10 schrieb Roman Haefeli:
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 17:07 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:On May 25, 2009, at 9:17 PM, danomatika wrote:I don't really need an accelerated gui as I like what Pd has now, I just think these basic elements should not peg the cpu in -nogui mode. That way I can work in a nice graphical environment to create the patches, then run said patches in the minimal environment and not get penalized for using gui objects/parameters.why aren't you putting a: [r NOGUI] | [spigot] in front of every gui object? don't get me wrong, i am not saying, that i wouldn't like to see thatautomatically happen in pd, when used in -nogui mode, but until this isimplemented, this might be an approach for a workaround. roman
PGP.sig
Description: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
