Hi Frank, No I did not see yours and so I updated my list-abs and indeed your list-group is what I was needed. In fact, yours is better as I did not provide for a list as input.
Thanks. ./MiS On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 4:37 AM, Frank Barknecht<[email protected]> wrote: > Hallo Michael, > > I could not yet look at your patch, but isn't your need the same as > [list-group] in the SVN? Maybe you haven't seen it yet. It's a rather new > object together with list-iter, they both clone the respective operations from > the [zl] object. > > There also is the older [list-lastx]. > > Ciao > -- > Frank > > Michal Seta hat gesagt: // Michal Seta wrote: > >> I am sure that someone has already thought about this before me but >> for some reason I did not see anything like this in the list-abs (or >> perhaps I am lagging behind the current version) but I needed an >> object to group incoming streams of numbers like [list-extend] does >> but with fixed number of atoms and output only when the list is ready >> (rather than incrementally like [list-extend] does). >> >> I attach my take on it. Maybe someone else will find it useful. >> >> Ciao >> >> ./MiS > > > >> _______________________________________________ >> [email protected] mailing list >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
