hi!

Actually I have no precise knowledge of dsp scheduling and such things, I only had this 64-sampes "problem" once but found other solutions to solve it. From my (current) point of view it's not a good method to reduce scheduling times too much on a desktop cpu, because of overhead becoming more and more significant - but maybe I'm totally wrong here and there are scheduling mechanisms without those side effects.

When I had this issue I had an idea to work out a "virtual" sample accurate timing mechanism on patch level which has additional 64 samples delay but gives you possibility to describe your problem as "sample based".

for example a threshold~ with sample accurate output can be achieved by using tabsend~ and tab_ge from iemtab. But that was not thought very far.

maybe I'll think about it when I have more time...

btw. what for did you need these high-accuracy timings? would be interesting to gather some of those timing problems and look for a common solution...

cheers
Martin




brandon zeeb wrote:
Any chance of having the ability to change that globally if need be?

On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Martin Schied <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    hi!


    hard off wrote:

        I made a patch which times the duration between two bangs sent
        by [bang~].   If i set the blocksize to the default of 64,
        then each bang comes 1.4ms apart - as expected with 44.1khz
        samplerate.

        However, making the blocksize smaller has no effect on the
        duration between the bangs.
        Does bang~ have a speedlimit of 64 samples?  If not, what is
        the limiting factor stopping me getting bangs more often than
        every 1.4ms?

    it's a 64 samples limit as far as i read in archives some time ago...
    http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2002-04/006123.html

    Martin


    _______________________________________________
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> mailing list
    UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
    http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to