IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > Andrew Faraday wrote: >> >> Just an idea, but if the hardware random number generators use a jittery >> oscillator etc. Why not use [noise~] and [snapshot~] followed by some >> arithmetic and [int] you could build what I assume would be more random >> than the [random] box. > > weird idea. > especially, since [noise~] uses exactly the same pseudo-random algorithm > as [snapshot~].
Snapshot~ outputs random numbers? That would explain a lot of oddities in my patches ;) What does make sense is to use noise *from the adc* with snapshot~ to get seeds for your random objects, I think that was what Frank meant with the "Can of Beats" patch. Cheers, g. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
