Hi IOhannes, Your right, of course.
Guess I needed that conceptual shift, not just relying on objects/abstractions to do the work for me. Cheers, Jbz 2009/8/1 IOhannes m zmölnig <[email protected]> > J bz wrote: > >> Hey IOhannes, >> >> Yeah I thought about moses but doesn't moses always start at 0? >> > > no, why do you think so? > (unless you mean, by "starting" what is the default behaviour when you > don't specify an argument and/or don't reset the limit) > > even if it did, you could always translform the numbers into the range you > want them to be with simple linear transformation as learned in high-school > (y=kx*d) > > anyhow:: > > [moses 10] will divide at 10, whereas the following will divide at -5: > > [loadbang] > | > [-5( > | > [moses 20] > > > fmasd > IOhannes >
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
