ooh thanks! i'll try that in this days and tell you the results!
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 4:34 PM, E<[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Tried to launch pd as root ? > > Or > $sudo chmod 755 /dev/#### > (replace #### by the hid device you want to use) > > The hid problem is probably that as user you don't have the right to read > the hid pseudofile. > > bye > > Le 07-août-09 à 20:55, Gabriel Vinazza a écrit : > >> i'm on linux recently, with a REALLY OLDER hardware than you.. >> >> tried fluxbuntu (careful, the repositories were migrated.. see ubuntu >> gutsy), works very well.. >> >> and now i'm with the last ubuntu 9.04 and i'm very suprised to see >> that it works fine on my old thinkpad a22p!!! >> >> >> THE BAD SIDE: >> >> * the audio input does not work (on windows it was fine) >> * can't figure it out to make work hids and midi inputs :( yeah, it hurts >> * had to use the previous kernel, the last one killed my wireless >> connection >> >> >> puppy looks good.. >> >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Rich E<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I think the biggest difference in linux, with a machine of your speed, >>> will >>> be how good your soundcard / videocard is. Also, if you are new to >>> linux, >>> it will save you a load of grief by starting with one of the more popular >>> multimedia distributions like Ubuntu, 64studio, or Fedora, as there is >>> support to get you through the problems you will run into. >>> >>> I think any Linux OS / windowing environment will be faster that windows, >>> provided it is configured properly and all your hardware is supported. >>> >>> rich >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 9:32 AM, donotreply >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> I am thinking in migrating to linux and considering small versions of it >>>> in order to boost speed, like> >>>> >>>> -damm small linux >>>> -puppy linux >>>> -fluxbuntu >>>> >>>> I'am not a deep tech guy (not referring to music style, which I like), >>>> so >>>> the questions are> >>>> >>>> 1-have anyone try these small OS before? if so... does it improve >>>> puredata >>>> performance? >>>> 2-are there any known bugs for puredata in these linux? >>>> 3-any of these three versions recomended? >>>> 4-any linux version recomended (besides these, if these are not >>>> recomended)? >>>> >>>> my hardware is not really slow (hp pavilion dv1680 core duo 1.83 ghz 1 >>>> Gb >>>> ram) so I thought using Ubuntu Studio (real time kernell sounds good, >>>> although it is chinese for me) but some comments on the web says it does >>>> not >>>> make a great speed difference migrating from xp and I would really like >>>> my >>>> machine to fly at the highest speed posible. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> Best >>>> >>>> Fernando >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> [email protected] mailing list >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >>>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> [email protected] mailing list >>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> [email protected] mailing list >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
