Unfortunately I have to agree with David....if I run any patch with -nogui from my terminal, then freeverb~ is bypassed (please find a simple input reverb example patch). This doesn't make sense at all! Any ideas at all how to solve this?
Juan (Pd version 0.41.4 running on Mac OS X 10.5.8) 2008/9/26 David F. Place <[email protected]> > > Hi: > > I would like to do some batch processing into ".wav" files. This should > be easily accomplished by running pd with -noaudio and -nogui. It > almost works. I run my signal through [freeverb~] just before output. > If I run the patch with -nogui, freeverb~ is bypassed and the sound is > dry. In every other way, it works properly. Why this difference in > output just because of -nogui? I attach a demo patch. > > To reproduce: > > To hear the output with reverb: > > 1. pd -noloadbang freeBug.pd > 2. click on the bang labeled "Click!" > 3. wait about 15 secs, pd will quit > 4. aplay /tmp/foo.wav > > With reverb mysteriously bypassed: > > 1. pd -nogui freeBug.pd > 2. wait about 15 secs, pd will quit > 3. play /tmp/foo.wav > > uname -a > Linux Congo 2.6.25.14-108.fc9.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Aug 4 13:46:35 EDT 2008 > x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > pd -version > Pd version 0.41-4 > compiled 18:31:52 Aug 14 2008 > > freeverb~ 1.2 > > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >
freeverb_test.pd
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
