Well, that would be exactly what I was looking for. Thanks! I must have skimmed past that last night...
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:48 PM, Jonathan Wilkes<[email protected]> wrote: > Have you tried using the [bag] object? > > -Jonathan > > --- On Thu, 8/13/09, Amos Robinson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> From: Amos Robinson <[email protected]> >> Subject: [PD] sustain pedal abstraction >> To: "pd list" <[email protected]> >> Date: Thursday, August 13, 2009, 3:06 PM >> Hi guys, >> >> Just in case you're interested, I wanted to use my sustain >> pedal in >> Pd, so wrote these abstractions: >> sustain, with three inputs: note, velocity, pedal (nonzero >> for >> sustain, zero for no effect) >> >> dam, with two inputs: a list value, and flow bool. >> >> I guess when flow is 0 it's like a [pipe 1e999], and flow >> set to 1 it >> flushes. I thought of doing it that way but felt that using >> lists >> would be better. I think after actually implementing it >> though I've >> changed my mind. >> >> Question: is there a simpler way than these that I'm >> missing? >> >> Thanks, >> Amos Robinson >> >> -----Inline Attachment Follows----- >> >> _______________________________________________ >> [email protected] >> mailing list >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >> > > > > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
