Hallo, Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > On Aug 15, 2009, at 12:05 PM, Frank Barknecht wrote: >> Maybe on the Java side, OSC is a bit easier if you use some OSC >> libraries. > > The pd message format is just text ending with a ";\n". In Java, if you > set the buffers to flush on \n, then it should work well. There's not > really anything else to it, so IMHO OSC is an extra headache, unless you > want the timetagging features.
I do agree that FUDI-messages as used by netsend are generally simpler than OSC, but *if* there are libraries for dealing with OSC, then *maybe* it is easier for someone to just plug these into an app than to roll your own stuff with netsend and low-level socket programming. IIRC in Processing OSC is directly supported so nothing would need to be added anyway. Ciao -- Frank _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
