Of course, feedback does not require simultaneity...nor does it always
imply an acoustic system (though I'm guessing that's what you're
referring to, Derek). One nice thing about those digital goblins is
that they can feed-back *information* about the music. More
interestingly, they can feed-back *permuted* information about the
music, kind of like a delay line with ideas of its own.
Phil Stone
www.pkstonemusic.com
Derek Holzer wrote:
I can't really say from a supra-atomic standpoint I could agree with
you, but I'd settle for the speed of light, or even the remotely
distant figure of the response time of an op-amp. Which is quite a bit
faster than your average blocksize or even a single discrete
sample--assuming that a complex digital system like Pd could react
effectively at single-sample speed.
Really though, must everything really be so complicated Mathieu? Not
everything can be so easily described with mathematics. I also like to
sip single malt whiskey during the last evening hours of a summer
headed towards autumn...
Sorry to stir up the digital goblins, folks. I merely wanted to share
my (unsatisfactory) experiences with feedback scenarios in Pd. Your
Mileage May Vary.
D.
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
Instantaneousness is a myth. It does not exist in nature.
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
