Hello
simply :
[pix_motionblur] and not [pix_blur]
If you want only a blur effect in GEM, it's your stuff.
friendly
p
Le 1 oct. 09 à 02:19, Mathieu Bouchard a écrit :
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, [email protected] wrote:
From what i understood, i should use Pd+GEM to achieve my goal.
But in
GEM documentation, i only found "pixel_blur", which looks
irrelevant.
Feel free to ask me any question, maybe what i explained is not clear
enough, or you need extra informations.
Well, it would be clearer if anyone of us knew why [pix_blur] is
irrelevant.
I'm quite experienced in Linux, opensource software, and
electronics ;
so don't fear to get into tech things.
Well, if you want to apply any amount of blur, of any shape of blur,
in always the same amount of time, there's only one way that I know
about, and it's using Fourier transforms.
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard, Montréal, Québec. téléphone:
+1.514.383.3801_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
