Le mercredi 14 octobre 2009 à 22:00 +0200, cyrille henry a écrit : > > Jack a écrit : > > Le mercredi 14 octobre 2009 à 19:32 +0200, cyrille henry a écrit : > >> IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit : > >> > >>> from [gemhead]s help-patch for negatvie render-orders: "Note, that > >>> Higher values (-3) will be rendered BEFORE higher values (-10)." > >> HIGHER values are rendered before HIGHER value??? > > :) > > 1 before 50 before 99 before -1 before -50 before -99. > i know what the rendering order is. i just find this sentence very confusing. Yes, i know that you know :) it was not for you, but an answer for Jose ;) About that, there is still an error in the gemhead example. How can i correct this ? (if i can). ++
Jack > > > So higher values (-3) will be rendered before lower values (-10) ;) > this one look better. > > c > > > ++ > > > > Jack > > > > > >> cyrille > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> [email protected] mailing list > >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > >> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > [email protected] mailing list > > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
