On Sat, 17 Oct 2009, dmotd wrote:
i understand yr frustration with the pdpedia, but i am still of the
belief that pd and its numerous (count thousands) of objects (and
abstractions) do need a pure reference online, and i do believe the wiki
format suits maintaining a said reference.
If only a PdPedia meeting could occur so that all participants can finally
agree that PdPedia is not gonna go anywhere and is taking the energy and
attention away from improving the currently most-up-to-date documentation
sources...
However, googlable online docs would still be a good idea, as long as it
is all done automatically, so that it doesn't duplicate any efforts,
doesn't splinter other documentation projects, and doesn't cause headaches
on how to merge the different documentation sources together. Edition
features can be replaced by appropriate mailing-lists and enough svn
accesses for everybody.
*-help.pd files need your help.
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard, Montréal, Québec. téléphone: +1.514.383.3801
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
