-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > There are other objects that do that, but its best to not hve it that > way, IMHO. IOhannes suggested fixing this on the internal side, but I > think its OK to handle it in the external itself. If you make a patch, > submit it to the patch tracker.
i suggested adding user-feedback if the object couldn't be created because of missing arguments. the problem here is that the object only creates without arguments once it has been created with arguments. i think this is something different (and entirely confusing). either an object should create with a given set of arguments or not. somewhat related is the question of system exclusive ressources (e.g. a port for [netreceive]). i find it highly frustrating that all of the network server objects will plainly refuse to instantiate if they cannot allocate the given port. i would very much appreciate, if i could get feedback on the success and retry another port. just wanted to get rid of this. mfgasdr IOhannes -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAksDtIMACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvStYgCg83Gcb/10U4Dj65xKt76yGQXz 09AAoI6Ab3mHkWj/rJsOgKtbq97Gpj2a =EAje -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
