Mathieu Bouchard escribió:
In some cases some developer (I won't tell the name, but it's someone
very important here) was able to find specific bugs and fixed it and
published a new release.
I think it's more constructive to say who fixed bugs, even if it's
someone who wrote the bugs in the first place. We shouldn't have a
culture in which bugs are that much shameful,
Wait wait wait, i'm SORRY for the terrible MISUNDERSTANDING here - well
i'd rather call it MISEXPLAINING to place the blame on the right place,
which is on me.
The reason why I didn't tell the name wasn't ABSOLUTELY that. That
possibility didn't even come up to my mind, and no, I don't consider
bugs a shameful thing, not only that much but not even a bit.
Also, the part of not telling the name was a kind of a joke since I
_thought_ it was clear I was talking about Miller. I didn't "want to"
tell the name (facetiously) in order to avoid "setting a precedent" so
that every user would start sending Miller crashing patches and expect
bug fixes for the next day.
When Miller wrote me (publicly in this m/l) to send him a crashing patch
(in reply to a message of mine about some bug), he started the message
with "It's a dangerous thing to offer, but...".
--
Matteo Sisti Sette
matteosistise...@gmail.com
http://www.matteosistisette.com
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
