olsen wrote: > hi > thanks to IOhannes indications i'm feeding my pix_mulitblob output into > the iemmatrix now. as long as there're enough blobs in the picture it > works pretty nice. but as soon as there're less blobs than given in the > argument to pix_multiblob i get: > error: $43: argument number out of range > error: $44: argument number out of range
without looking at the patch, i can tell you that this is because you are actually _not_ using iemmatrix for handling the matrix. instead your patch tries to manually parse the data using dollargs and whatelse; which obviously fails if there are too few arguments (because the matrix is too small) > ... > for all the arguments of undetected blobs. and as soon as there's no > blob in the picture the pd-shell reports: > matrix : corrupt matrix passed this indicates that you _are_ using iemmatrix here. if no blobs are detected, pix_multiblob will output a somewhat illegal matrix with zero rows (and a number of columns). now iemmatrix complains that this is not a legal matrix. probably putting a [mtx_check] helps to get rid of the error (or not) > do i do something wrong? no. fgmasdr IOhannes
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
