cyrille henry wrote: > hello, > > yes, you did fix the Gem loading error. > (i had to make clean before autogen etc)
ah yes (you should have been able to make clean after autblah as well)
> so i gess i can now test 0.43
>
> 1st, i've got a stupid question : here is a snapshot of both 0.43 an 0.42.
> do i have a problem somewhere, or is 0.43 really suppose to look better
> than 0.42?
this is how 0.43 currently looks.
i take your "look better" for slight sarcasm here, though i don't think
it looks that bad (apart from the non-bold font)
there is definitely a bug in the linespacing ("\n" are inserted at will)
fgmadsr
IOhannes
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
