On 2010-02-09 11:21, ypatios wrote: > Hallo Frank :-), thanks for your reply > > (i updated the subject since the discussion moved on..) > > While you could bang vsnapshot~ at samplerate and keep track of samples in a >> list or so, this is a waste of resources. Something like tabsend~ or >> tabwrite~ >> probably is much better: Just write a number of samples into a table and >> then >> analyse that for peaks. There are some externals for that or do it >> manually. >> > > As I understand it (and hopefully i am not completely wrong..) you don't > have to 'store' a list and 'then' read again it to find the max magnitude. > It's as simple as the following:
i haven't tested it, but you might be way more efficient when using [tabsend~] to write to an array and analyse it as frank suggested. ah, and iemlib's [pvu~] has a rudimentary peak-detector built in, if you can live with externals. fgm,adr IOhannes
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
